Dec 152017
 

 

Christmas ornamentIt’s that time of year when some of us feel compelled to put forth our version of an inspirational message. In times past, I’ve been inspired by both baser and higher impulses. I’ve written about gratitude on more than one occasion, although, truth be told, I find the collective impulse to remind ourselves and everyone else to be grateful to be a little, well, grating. Most of the people I know are well aware of what they have; it doesn’t mean they can or should ignore what they—what we all—might be missing.

On the other hand, words of doom and gloom seem particularly inappropriate this time of year. Not that it’s a happy time for many people I know. I have a number of friends, some virtual, some not, who have faced enormous health and financial challenges this year. I hurt on their behalf. Hell, I hurt on behalf of all the fearful people in the world, myself included.

In my case, the fears are both ordinary and extraordinary, micro and macro. I worry about growing old and becoming infirm, sure. I don’t like the idea of being alone or otherwise disconnected.

Most of all, though, what I fear is an increase (or no visible decrease, at any rate) in illogical, closed-minded intolerance. I call it non-thinking, the visceral reactive state that has far too many people clinging to their beliefs as if they were life preservers. It’s difficult for me to understand how, in 2017 (the twenty-first century!), whole swaths of folks adhere to a values hierarchy that has little to do with morality. They hold fast to outdated or outright false Biblical, biological, and generational maxims at the expense of anything approaching humanity. How else does a cruel, narcissistic adulterer become a touchstone for so many? How else does false equivalency gain credence, while “fake news” is defined as anything remotely critical, regardless of objectivity? How can groups of people be dismissed because of who they are, what they believe, or how they love? How do we live in a world where dictators are heroes and heroes are maligned?

But doom and gloom don’t move us forward any more than do lectures on gratitude or syrupy seasonal wishes. Which is why, after cruising through holiday messages of yore, I’ve gone back to a statement I penned several years ago and lifted from my book Hope in Small Doses. It’s a sort of declaration, not of war or even of independence but of resolve. I have to revisit it from time to time, but now it’s part of my DNA. If it suits or serves you moving into 2018, then by all means, let this be my gift to you.

small christmas tree“I choose hope, at least in small doses. I choose to assign myself a purpose, and embrace the journey that leads to the fulfillment of that purpose. I acknowledge the risk of stumbling along the way, of never completely accomplishing what I set out to do, or of discovering that I inadvertently changed course. I accept as a working theory that humans live their best lives when they ascribe meaning to their lives. I take as a matter of faith that it is within each of us to live meaningful lives, to love, to interact, to connect in fellowship; and that how long our reach, or wide our influence, is far less important than the path we set for ourselves. I realize I will always feel some disappointment and may come to conclusions and discoveries late in life that I wish I’d reached earlier. But so what? That only means I’ve been growing and learning. It also means I’m human…and being fully, completely human is always going to be my most important accomplishment.

I don’t propose to know how hope will continue to fit into my life. I only know that in some small measure, I want it. I need it. I deserve it. We all do.”

Happy holidays whoever and wherever. Here’s to a bright 2018.

May 062015
 

First let me offer a disclaimer: I don’t work for Google. Neither do members of my immediate or extended family. In fact I don’t personally know anyone who works for Google. Nor did Google offer to pay me or at least improve my SEO or my Q score,* even though I could use some assistance in those departments. I admit Google Chrome is my default browser, although its ranking methodology (most familiar, most searched, pays us the most money) sometimes leads me to other browsers that might yield more arcane or less commerce-dependent results. And yes, I retain several G-mail accounts.

But I am not in their debt and they’re clearly not in mine, which is why I feel free to declare to the world at large that I am over the moon when it comes to Google Earth.

Google Earth, for anyone left on said planet who may not know, is “a virtual globe, map and geographical information program that was originally called EarthViewer 3D created by Keyhole, Inc, a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) funded company acquired by Google in 2004.” This bit of information brought to us by Wikipedia and clearly public Google map carknowledge, nevertheless sent a shiver up my spine. Just because spy organizations sell divisions to private companies doesn’t mean we’re safer from prying eyes. Forget the NSA; Google probably owns more satellites, or it soon will. Ever since those adorable little camera mounted cars started patrolling our streets in order to keep Google Maps updated, privacy became a quaint notion associated with a time of horse-drawn buggies and night-time skies that were filled with actual stars.

Google Earth is nothing if not democratic. We’re all spies now, capable of looking down at a house in Uzbekistan or a swimming pool in Melbourne. While much of the imaging is still 2-D, Google Earth is now able to use data provided by NASA to give us 3-D views of many parts of the world. Pretty cool.

The coolest thing, though, is how Google Earth is helping me write my novel.

Sure, I have to do things like develop character and plot. I have to sit down and write, which some days means a couple of thousand words and some days means I fritter away my time in meaningless research. One area of investigation that isn’t insignificant, however, is locale. My novel is set in New Orleans, a place I visited for a few days about seven months ago. I’ve been unable to schedule another visit but I’m writing away. Reading about it, even looking at YouTube videos, takes me only so far. That’s where Google Earth comes in.

Without giving too much away, I wrote a scene that takes place on Bourbon Street during the busiest time of year: Mardi Gras. A crime is committed; one I imagined would be outside yet out of sight of the most of the huge numbers of revelers. How, or rather, where could this happen?

eye in magnifying glass clip artUsing Google Earth, I took a virtual stroll up and down Bourbon. I had already mapped a route for my characters and noted the places they passed and what they might see as they looked around. Then I moved to the side streets, looking for alleys or back lots. A food market looked promising but swooping in, I saw no street access to the back. A left turn down another side street revealed a recessed driveway with a gate that was sometimes locked, sometimes unlocked. My crime could take place behind that gate. The perpetrator could then either walk back to Bourbon or choose a parallel street and make his way down to one of two streetcar lines.

As I continue to locate my action in this or that part of New Orleans, I visit via Google New Orleans map 1860Earth. Don’t misunderstand me; I don’t think it’s a substitute for a real visit. I plan to return soon, to walk the streets my characters walk, peek into doorways and stop into shops, ride the streetcar again and sit in Jackson Square on a sultry afternoon eating a beignet. I need to smell the velvety air, feel the humidity settle on me like a sweater and absorb the uniquely mystical, magical, musical atmosphere that is the Big Easy. When the schedule clears and the airfare drops, I’ll be there. In the meantime, Earth to Google: let’s go for a walk.

Apr 202015
 

Liebster-award-logoI’ve been nominated for a Liebster Award. The award is given to bloggers by other bloggers. The nomination might be the award or at least the point. It’s a “pay it forward” chain letter to promote other bloggers. The blog I visited to read about it suggested that everyone who blogs knows about the award unless he or she is a newbie. I’ve been blogging for at least a decade, even before web log morphed into blog and I didn’t know about the Liebster Award. I lead an insular life.

Blogging has gotten a bad rap. I can understand this: writing about one’s life is a form of navel-gazing or, in the worst instances (of which there are many), an instance of verbal diarrhea. Nearly everyone seems compelled these days to talk about themselves and their experiences. Not everyone—not even close to everyone—can write in a way that entertains, instructs, moves, amuses or even interests the reader. Wading through the verbiage can be exhausting.

Allow me to pay it behind and ahead by directing you to two bloggers worth reading.

Friend and fellow life traveler Anne Born has nominated me. Anne is the author of two books, A Marshmallow on the Bus and Prayer Beads on a Train. She is a lovely writer but more importantly, she is a wonderful storyteller. Story telling is in danger of becoming a lost art, although there are some terrific genre writers and the always-reliable StoryCorps, which is dedicated to collecting stories about people and their experiences. Storytelling is how history is preserved and, in my humble opinion, how understanding is reached. Trust me on this, people: When the power goes out, we will need our storytellers.

There are various obligations concerning the award. I am to introduce you to Anne, list eleven things about myself, answer the nominator’s questions and then nominate someone else. My merry band of readers, at least fifty percent of whom are NOT writers, must know whatever they need to about me but I live to serve, so I’ll make it brief. First, my eleven things: green is my favorite color; pink is my most flattering color; autumn is my favorite season; my first boyfriend’s name was Ken; I like to eat; I love to bicycle; I’ve visited Paris five times (so far); “Adagio for Strings” makes me weep and so does “You Make Me Feel Like a Natural Woman;” I don’t have a “favorite” book; I like parks but not zoos; I’m still trying to learn to meditate.

Anne’s questions are harder because, to be honest,  I’m not a fan of these sorts of things. I am Anne’s fan, though, here are her questions answered: My desert island soundtrack would be Carol King; I got my first passport when I was 14; I eat dinner, not supper, and it includes a protein and a vegetable; I love the orange in a sunset; I’m not a football fan; on the spot I’d write fiction; I was two years old when I took my first plane ride; I’m old-school when it comes to picnics in the park—glasses, cloth napkins, baskets, etc., I have gotten lost more than once; yes, I can sing; and finally, I drink my coffee black.

Going forward, I won’t subject my nominee to my questions but I will ask that he mention me, nominate another and yes, share ten fun facts about himself. I can guarantee you they will be funny because he is funny.

Nominating Boston writer Con Chapman for a Liebster is easy. He is a humorist and he knows what that means and how to deliver. Believe me, he elevates blogging to an art form. Go visit his website and check out both his blog and his books (Baseball lovers will be interested in Cannacorn and Year of the Gerbil).

As for me, I intend to savor my award or nomination. After ten years of blogging away, it’s nice to be recognized.