Aug 162020
 
Background: Before he died, Arley Fitchett had collected a group of historical letters of dubious origin, letters he nevertheless believed would lead him to a rare treasure hidden on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. One example is the letter below, purportedly written by William Calvert, cousin to the fifth Lord Baltimore.

 


 

25 March 1718

Dear Teresa,

I feel as if the very fact of my last letter has brought a Curse upon this ship (although I do not believe in such things). We are becalmed. Having forsaken the unpredictable headwinds for a more southerly course, we now find the wind that had powered our sails these three weeks quite disappeared off the face of the Earth. ’Tis but our fourth day, not yet cause for great concern. Even after a relatively short time, though, I can see its effect upon the men.

The captain and first and second mates are huddled below deck, examining charts and deciding what recourse may be available to us I do not know what is to be done except to trust in Our Lord and the skills of our most able crew.

As I have even more time than usual, having been deprived of my opportunity to watch the men at work, I have decided to examine the gift I bear. I must do so with utmost discretion, as I am charged by my cousin with delivering it in person to its future owner without bringing undue attention to either the piece or its intended recipient.

The piece is a carving commissioned by Lord Baltimore and executed by the Royal Court Woodworker, a Mr. Grinling Gibbons. I should not have imagined that a piece of wood, however artfully molded, could change the dynamics of a political or personal relationship. But as I have learned, my cousin has developed his own approach to the art of trading favours and securing alliances.

Having cast mine own eyes upon the piece in question, I daresay it commands the power to bring to heel anyone into whose possession it falls. I took the liberty to show it to Dr. Bell. That gentleman insists it is unlike anything any English artist has hitherto been inspired to create.

Not being inclined towards the Arts, I cannot vouchsafe that observation. Nor am I acquainted with other works created by Mr. Gibbons. Yet even to my untested eye, this Bird is a singular piece. I trust my efforts to describe it will meet your more refined standards.

A small bird rests within the palm of an outstretched hand that appears to belong to a young woman. The bird is delicately rendered, life-like and yet not ornate. A few deft cuts indicate a wing here, a beak there. The simple lines suggest a degree of life I would not have believed possible in an inanimate object, as if the bird might take flight at any moment.

The figure has been wrought from an exotic wood, deep brown in colour with a touch of red and a subtly varied grain that give it further depth. Doctor Bell has identified it as sapele, a sort of mahogany found in the East German African colonies. Although I cannot fathom how he knows this, I am learning that Thaddeus Bell is in possession of a great many facts as well as countless theories.

Mr. Gibbons has created but a single eye so piercing one feels one is being watched by a wild animal. The brightness of the orb is enhanced by the use of an impressive gemstone of deep penetrating blue. Captain Digg, whom I confess has also seen the item, has identified it as a rare sapphire from the northern part of India.

The carving is housed within a closed cage made of a reddish metal and fitted with a lock whose key I keep on my person at all times. It cannot otherwise be opened. A fine silk cloth covers the cage, in order to give the illusion of transporting a live creature.

All in all, a most remarkable, not to say extravagant, gift that speaks of profound gratitude. Governor Hart deserves no less. He has been stalwart in supporting our family when others have vowed harm to the Calverts, and his loyalty has not gone unnoticed.

As I write this, I sense upon my neck the faintest stirring of air. It may be my imagination at work. One can only hope.

I think of you constantly. Until my return, I hope my words may provide some amusement.

Your loving fiancé,

William

Jul 292019
 

Molly crouch nowMolly has turned fourteen, which means she’s either 88, 84, or 76 years old, depending on which chart you follow. I prefer the one at her vet’s office, which measures her size, weight, current health and puts her at 72 years. I prefer that calculation. I like to think that she, like me, has a bit more time left on the clock. Although such things are unpredictable at our age.

She’s a Cavachon, a mix of Cavalier King Charles spaniel and Bichon Frise. King Charles are much prized lap dogs, cuddly, sweet-eyed, sweet-tempered, a little needy. Bichons are playful, curious, bred to entertain. Molly is a combination of both, which means she has a big personality, a defined set of likes and dislikes, a touch of anxiety, an obvious preference for people over dogs, and a big appetite for playing and eating. Physically, she seems to have inherited the best of each—she remains a good-looking dog with soft fur and lovely eyes, ears, and tail. Her weight is low, her physical ailments few, even as her similarly aged canine acquaintances struggle.

Still, we’re both growing old, she obviously at a faster rate. At this moment, we’re moving together into what you might call early old age (although I’d prefer not to) and hitting the same issues, human and canine versions, at the same time. This has been a blessing and a curse. It’s also the reality of caring for a senior dog—or a senior human.

Molly thenIf you’d asked me twenty years ago whether I’d care for (much less worry about) a senior dog, I would have said, “Doubtful.” Then again, if you’d asked me where I expected to be, I’d have said in Florida or Canada with my loving husband. Then he died and I had some quick adjusting to do, which ended up not being quick at all. Four years of hyper-activity only helped me so much. After I slowed down, the walls began to close in. I still lived where I lived, one of two occupants in a house I couldn’t seem to leave. Thus, a dog. A puppy, actually, whom I purchased when she was nine weeks and I was four years into my grief and still deeply afraid of making lasting connections.

I’d never owned a pet, not by myself. I had no idea what to do. How was I supposed to care for this tiny defenseless creature? I thought I wasn’t up to the task. A childless widow, what did I know? How could I handle the responsibility?

Molly and Nikki thenShe was a mellow puppy, which made things easier. She was also a life-saver, an identity-changer (I’m a dog owner!), a bit of a headache, and an absolute guarantee that the low moods and the dark thoughts to which I am prone could not pin me to my house, let alone my bed. My canine companion’s immediate and ongoing needs have always compelled me to, as a friend once said, “Get over your bad self.”

Molly has experienced some changes as she ages. Her anxiety has increased a bit. Her energy has dropped. She sometimes stops in the middle of the room for a second or two, as if trying to figure out what she meant to do. She’s developed idiopathic head tremors, small impulses that turn her into a bobble head for three or four seconds. If her knee is bothering her or she’s tired, she won’t jump up on the couch or finish her walk.

We’ve both adjusted to these issues. She’s learned to use the stairs to the bed. I’ve learned to lift 17 pounds without hurting my back. She’s adjusted to the tremor wave by taking a wider stance when it hits. She loves her mat by the front door (so she can monitor my comings and goings) as well as her car seat. We’ve even experimented with a stroller, which she seems to enjoy.

She seems otherwise happy and healthy, my Molly, and interested in life. She trots briskly, at least first thing in the morning. She’s still up for car rides and road trips and walks and games like fetch and new adventures and food, always food. Like me.

Her life will begin to be measured in months, not years. Maybe Molly and Nikki noweven shorter intervals. Her health can turn on a dime. That’s hard for me to accept, but I must. Living with a rapidly aging creature is a teaching moment. I frequently find myself lacking in either patience or gratitude. The care and maintenance of a senior dog requires the one and urges the other. That’s a lesson I’m working hard to absorb, a lesson that will be Molly’s lasting gift to me.

Jun 112019
 

Remember, we were discussing predestination the other night (I almost wrote “prestidigitation,” no doubt because I’ve been ruminating on the disappearance from our union of anything remotely resembling love. Where did the magic go?) At any rate and as usual, you came down on one side of the issue and I on the other. Although that’s not fair to me. I’d merely wanted to explore the possibility of the existence of predestination, and you were having none of it.

“What, you think there’s some great sky-dwelling Decider who’s actually taken the time away from more pressing matters to assign some outcome or other to our miserable lives?” you asked.

As always, your questions weren’t really questions, but rather dismissive declarations, preemptive rejections that are designed to forestall either the possibility of a balanced discourse or any attempt at civilized conversation. Anyway, we never so much talk as we fence, parry and thrust, protect our respective flanks, while seeking out the opponent’s most vulnerable and exposed side.

Quite the pair, we two, one laboriously educated but intellectually lazy, the other an autodidact, fashioning bits of accumulated wisdom into a ladder or a rope by which she might climb to higher ground. My insecurity has never been a match for your absolute certainty. Possibly your early attempts at affection were born of pity or some sense of noblesse oblige. You were, after all, to the manor born, your choices laid out before you or within easy reach, like a sumptuous banquet or low-hanging fruit. Was marrying beneath you a way to cause a frisson of shock amongst your peers? Did they applaud you for slumming it, everyone secure in the knowledge you could bring me to heel? Or perhaps you were meeting some challenge to raise up an unfortunate or respond to some charitable requirement incumbent upon your social class. Apart from the carnal needs that conflate young lust with young love, what brought us together? Surely, we weren’t predisposed to choose each other, so perhaps our union was predestined after all.

These musings, some (but never all) of which I’ve voiced, fall into a category you gleefully term faux philosophy, so that when you’ve enjoyed two or three of your nightly Scotches, you can simply dismiss my explorations as more of the same bullshit. Sometimes you humor me (or at least that’s what I suspect you’re doing) by pretending we’re having a conversation. I imagine it’s a form of light exercise, something you might attempt before bed or with one hand tied behind your back or two Scotches under your belt.

Sometimes you toss out phrases from a long-ago undergraduate seminar: rhetorical tautologies, logical contingencies, or propositional variables. Other times you let out my leash, allowing me to speculate as you feign interest in what must seem to you to be endless ramblings about ontological mysteries.

You never let me go on for long. At some point you always reach for the metaphorical hammer or knife or chisel, or whatever instrument you’ve chosen with exquisite care so as to best cut me off, shut me down, whittle me to the bone. A well-timed correction or falsely casual observation might derail my earnest train of thought. Another weapon in your arsenal: changing the subject. How perfectly insulting. Oh yes, you may also remove your attention altogether. The net effect is always been the same: your wife, your life partner, is left disoriented, confused, and filled with shame. It’s an art and a science. And you’ve perfected it.

Why did I believe you were engaging me that night? Your opening salvo hardly created the conditions that might presage a hopeful outcome. How could I not consider you might be planning a new form of sabotage? Perhaps I thought you were tired of toying with me. Yet when I asked you whether naming a pig Bacon increased the likelihood that the pig would be slaughtered, no matter how beloved the animal or how contrary to the owner’s original intention, you actually appeared to give it some thought.

“That’s an interesting question,” you began.

I braced in anticipation of the stomach punch that was sure to come, but you continued almost placidly, “The pig is clearly a passive player in all this. Even if it had free will (and I imagine you’ll agree it does not), it can’t act on its own. It can’t change its name. It can’t declare its independence. It might try to escape, although why would it? Pigs are generally content with certain basics, which most owners are content to provide. The animal isn’t physically, mentally, or even temperamentally inclined to make a decision about whatever fate the owner has in store for it. Are you suggesting the owner’s choice of a name is somehow predestined?”

Then—wonder of wonders—you hesitated, providing an opening, an invitation to respond.

Naive believer that I was, I began, albeit carefully, “I suppose it’s really a question of cause and effect. What compels the owner to name the pig Bacon? Did he already have plans for the pig before it was born? Does the name suggest the inevitability of the slaughter? Perhaps his children, who view the pig as a sort of pet, have come up with the name? Maybe they  intend to be ironic—children have a disturbingly sophisticated view of the world—or maybe they mean it to be charming. They’re unlikely to want the name to either signal the pig’s unhappy fate as breakfast meat or to influence any decision made by their father.”

Chancing a quick look at your face, I could see your good-natured exterior begin to curdle at the edges. Too late, I realized my mistake.

“Most pigs are slaughtered, dear wife, excepting those little Vietnamese pigs some fancy as pets. The pig’s destiny, if you will, is known from the moment it is born. Even you can’t be wrong-headed enough to suggest the name alone seals the poor piglet’s fate. It’s simply not . . . kosher.”

You laughed, heartily amused by your little joke at my expense, then leaned in for the kill, eyes narrowed, lips quivering with suppressed triumph.

“Let me provide a relevant example. Your insistence on trafficking in archaic superstition marks you as a stupid twit, to be sure; but my naming you as such isn’t what makes it so. Genetics and happenstance—i.e., you being deprived of a proper education—have conspired to attract you to a variety of foolish notions that appeal to your underdeveloped sensibility. I could call you Einstein, and what difference would it make? You’d still be a stupid twit.”

I felt the sting of your words as surely as if I’d been slapped. Ah, but you were just beginning to work yourself into a righteous state, weren’t you? One that brooked no interference.

“Here’s another: Callista is from the Greek meaning ‘great beauty’ and yet you haven’t lived up to that particular promise, have you? Perhaps your mother didn’t possess the foresight to assign you a name which meant ‘she who can’t string two coherent thoughts together.’ That would have gone a long way toward proving your little theory, wouldn’t it?”

And your final coup de grace: “Callista, your attempts at intelligent conversation literally suck the air out of the room. I’m headed to the club; I need to breathe.”

“I’m pregnant. A girl.”

My words were strangled, the sentences pushed unwillingly out into the world through the constricted passageway of my throat. But you heard them well enough. Your surprise and, yes, your anger were overtaken almost immediately by calculation: What injury would this new information allow you to inflict?

You chose a bluntly cruel, if predictable path: “Shall she be called Rose, then, as if she might have the slightest chance of living up to such a name? Although it’s ordinary enough, I suppose.”

You clapped your hands like a schoolyard bully whose found another creature to torture.

“I’ve come up with a most excellent idea,” you crowed. “Let’s call her Porcus. The more common Latin word for piglet, my dear. We can see whether her name consigns her to her destiny after all. I’d wager she has an even chance of living up to her appellation either way.”

You laughed, absolutely taken with your cleverness. Pivoting on one heel, you made your grand exit, theatrically slamming the door on your way out.

Alone in the hallway, I rested my hands on my stomach and spoke aloud.

“I have another idea. What do you think of the name Nemesis? She is the Greek goddess of retribution and revenge. Shall we name you after this most fearsome female? Will your destiny be to—?”

My soliloquy was cut off by the squeal of tires, accompanied by a loud thump, and then a silence that seemed to last an eternity.

I held my breath until I heard the confirming cacophony that accompanies an unexpected tragedy: the screams, the running feet, the cries of “Call an ambulance!” “Oh my God!” and the like.

I stood stock-still, hardly daring to breath. Then I felt something move within me, although it was weeks too early. A kick or perhaps a tiny fist pressing gently against my stomach. I patted my barely perceptible bulge and smiled.

“You are your mother’s daughter, aren’t you little one? I don’t think we need to saddle you with an intimidating name, though. I believe you’ll make a perfectly exquisite Rose.”