Jun 112019
 

Remember, we were discussing predestination the other night (I almost wrote “prestidigitation,” no doubt because I’ve been ruminating on the disappearance from our union of anything remotely resembling love. Where did the magic go?) At any rate and as usual, you came down on one side of the issue and I on the other. Although that’s not fair to me. I’d merely wanted to explore the possibility of the existence of predestination, and you were having none of it.

“What, you think there’s some great sky-dwelling Decider who’s actually taken the time away from more pressing matters to assign some outcome or other to our miserable lives?” you asked.

As always, your questions weren’t really questions, but rather dismissive declarations, preemptive rejections that are designed to forestall either the possibility of a balanced discourse or any attempt at civilized conversation. Anyway, we never so much talk as we fence, parry and thrust, protect our respective flanks, while seeking out the opponent’s most vulnerable and exposed side.

Quite the pair, we two, one laboriously educated but intellectually lazy, the other an autodidact, fashioning bits of accumulated wisdom into a ladder or a rope by which she might climb to higher ground. My insecurity has never been a match for your absolute certainty. Possibly your early attempts at affection were born of pity or some sense of noblesse oblige. You were, after all, to the manor born, your choices laid out before you or within easy reach, like a sumptuous banquet or low-hanging fruit. Was marrying beneath you a way to cause a frisson of shock amongst your peers? Did they applaud you for slumming it, everyone secure in the knowledge you could bring me to heel? Or perhaps you were meeting some challenge to raise up an unfortunate or respond to some charitable requirement incumbent upon your social class. Apart from the carnal needs that conflate young lust with young love, what brought us together? Surely, we weren’t predisposed to choose each other, so perhaps our union was predestined after all.

These musings, some (but never all) of which I’ve voiced, fall into a category you gleefully term faux philosophy, so that when you’ve enjoyed two or three of your nightly Scotches, you can simply dismiss my explorations as more of the same bullshit. Sometimes you humor me (or at least that’s what I suspect you’re doing) by pretending we’re having a conversation. I imagine it’s a form of light exercise, something you might attempt before bed or with one hand tied behind your back or two Scotches under your belt.

Sometimes you toss out phrases from a long-ago undergraduate seminar: rhetorical tautologies, logical contingencies, or propositional variables. Other times you let out my leash, allowing me to speculate as you feign interest in what must seem to you to be endless ramblings about ontological mysteries.

You never let me go on for long. At some point you always reach for the metaphorical hammer or knife or chisel, or whatever instrument you’ve chosen with exquisite care so as to best cut me off, shut me down, whittle me to the bone. A well-timed correction or falsely casual observation might derail my earnest train of thought. Another weapon in your arsenal: changing the subject. How perfectly insulting. Oh yes, you may also remove your attention altogether. The net effect is always been the same: your wife, your life partner, is left disoriented, confused, and filled with shame. It’s an art and a science. And you’ve perfected it.

Why did I believe you were engaging me that night? Your opening salvo hardly created the conditions that might presage a hopeful outcome. How could I not consider you might be planning a new form of sabotage? Perhaps I thought you were tired of toying with me. Yet when I asked you whether naming a pig Bacon increased the likelihood that the pig would be slaughtered, no matter how beloved the animal or how contrary to the owner’s original intention, you actually appeared to give it some thought.

“That’s an interesting question,” you began.

I braced in anticipation of the stomach punch that was sure to come, but you continued almost placidly, “The pig is clearly a passive player in all this. Even if it had free will (and I imagine you’ll agree it does not), it can’t act on its own. It can’t change its name. It can’t declare its independence. It might try to escape, although why would it? Pigs are generally content with certain basics, which most owners are content to provide. The animal isn’t physically, mentally, or even temperamentally inclined to make a decision about whatever fate the owner has in store for it. Are you suggesting the owner’s choice of a name is somehow predestined?”

Then—wonder of wonders—you hesitated, providing an opening, an invitation to respond.

Naive believer that I was, I began, albeit carefully, “I suppose it’s really a question of cause and effect. What compels the owner to name the pig Bacon? Did he already have plans for the pig before it was born? Does the name suggest the inevitability of the slaughter? Perhaps his children, who view the pig as a sort of pet, have come up with the name? Maybe they  intend to be ironic—children have a disturbingly sophisticated view of the world—or maybe they mean it to be charming. They’re unlikely to want the name to either signal the pig’s unhappy fate as breakfast meat or to influence any decision made by their father.”

Chancing a quick look at your face, I could see your good-natured exterior begin to curdle at the edges. Too late, I realized my mistake.

“Most pigs are slaughtered, dear wife, excepting those little Vietnamese pigs some fancy as pets. The pig’s destiny, if you will, is known from the moment it is born. Even you can’t be wrong-headed enough to suggest the name alone seals the poor piglet’s fate. It’s simply not . . . kosher.”

You laughed, heartily amused by your little joke at my expense, then leaned in for the kill, eyes narrowed, lips quivering with suppressed triumph.

“Let me provide a relevant example. Your insistence on trafficking in archaic superstition marks you as a stupid twit, to be sure; but my naming you as such isn’t what makes it so. Genetics and happenstance—i.e., you being deprived of a proper education—have conspired to attract you to a variety of foolish notions that appeal to your underdeveloped sensibility. I could call you Einstein, and what difference would it make? You’d still be a stupid twit.”

I felt the sting of your words as surely as if I’d been slapped. Ah, but you were just beginning to work yourself into a righteous state, weren’t you? One that brooked no interference.

“Here’s another: Callista is from the Greek meaning ‘great beauty’ and yet you haven’t lived up to that particular promise, have you? Perhaps your mother didn’t possess the foresight to assign you a name which meant ‘she who can’t string two coherent thoughts together.’ That would have gone a long way toward proving your little theory, wouldn’t it?”

And your final coup de grace: “Callista, your attempts at intelligent conversation literally suck the air out of the room. I’m headed to the club; I need to breathe.”

“I’m pregnant. A girl.”

My words were strangled, the sentences pushed unwillingly out into the world through the constricted passageway of my throat. But you heard them well enough. Your surprise and, yes, your anger were overtaken almost immediately by calculation: What injury would this new information allow you to inflict?

You chose a bluntly cruel, if predictable path: “Shall she be called Rose, then, as if she might have the slightest chance of living up to such a name? Although it’s ordinary enough, I suppose.”

You clapped your hands like a schoolyard bully whose found another creature to torture.

“I’ve come up with a most excellent idea,” you crowed. “Let’s call her Porcus. The more common Latin word for piglet, my dear. We can see whether her name consigns her to her destiny after all. I’d wager she has an even chance of living up to her appellation either way.”

You laughed, absolutely taken with your cleverness. Pivoting on one heel, you made your grand exit, theatrically slamming the door on your way out.

Alone in the hallway, I rested my hands on my stomach and spoke aloud.

“I have another idea. What do you think of the name Nemesis? She is the Greek goddess of retribution and revenge. Shall we name you after this most fearsome female? Will your destiny be to—?”

My soliloquy was cut off by the squeal of tires, accompanied by a loud thump, and then a silence that seemed to last an eternity.

I held my breath until I heard the confirming cacophony that accompanies an unexpected tragedy: the screams, the running feet, the cries of “Call an ambulance!” “Oh my God!” and the like.

I stood stock-still, hardly daring to breath. Then I felt something move within me, although it was weeks too early. A kick or perhaps a tiny fist pressing gently against my stomach. I patted my barely perceptible bulge and smiled.

“You are your mother’s daughter, aren’t you little one? I don’t think we need to saddle you with an intimidating name, though. I believe you’ll make a perfectly exquisite Rose.”

Jan 302018
 

At 7:30 a.m. on a summer morning, the northern Wisconsin air did not yet hint at the promise of another typically beautiful day. Our twelve-year-old selves, denied the future pleasures of hot coffee, had stoked ourselves with pancakes and bacon.

Dressed in the camp uniform of blue shorts and white blouses, some of us with navy cardigans to ward off the lingering chill, we made our way to the platform, picked up our .22 caliber rifles and lay down. Ahead of us-it wouldn’t have been more than fifty feet-were an array of targets. My goal that day was to continue to move through the NRA-designed program and also move into a sitting position with a qualifying score.

Camp Whispering Pines for Girls was a full-throttle camp that offered instruction in a variety of water and land sports. I was a middle-class klutz with no talent for tennis, no build for competitive swimming, no chance of winning a footrace and enthusiasm but little experience on the back of a horse. But I could handle a rifle. It felt natural. It helped me focus. I understood the concept of the easy breath, the slow pull, the steadying opposition of the rifle butt kicking against the shoulder, and most of all, the exhilaration of hitting the target.

My uncle was an outdoorsman and a hunter, so I had a chance to fire a rifle at other times of the year. I never went hunting with him; I couldn’t bring myself to shoot at an animal, even a duck. But Uncle Bob was as enamored of sport shooting as I was. At his farm, we took aim at bottles and cans lined up on a fence and even clay pigeons shot into the air. Sometimes we used pistols but honestly, I was always most at ease with a rifle.

I had fun for a while. I impressed a high school boyfriend or two by winning a couple of stuffed animals at the State Fair. I briefly joined the National Rifle Association as a junior member. For eight years, I indulged my interest in marksmanship. Then the times changed and so did I. Physically and philosophically, target practice no longer attracted me.

Much later, after several intermediary careers, I’ve discovered writing produces a parallel sense of accomplishment. My “target” is a story with a voice, one that transcends the material and reaches the reader. Of course, it helps to write what you know. My two non-fiction books were both prompted by my experiences as a “9/11 widow”-how the death of my husband changed and didn’t change me, how it altered and didn’t alter the culture.

Fiction, I’ve learned, is trickier. As author, I have to relate to the characters I am creating if I expect my readers to do the same. It also helps if I can understand on some level what makes them tick.

Suzanne Foster is the protagonist who anchors my suspense novel, The Former Assassin. She’s a wife and a mother. She’s survived a neglected childhood, time living on the street, a stint in the Army, and twenty-five years in service to a criminal for whom she killed. She struggles with moral quandaries related to her career that I’ve never had to face. Nothing in her resume accords with my personal history.

Well, almost nothing. Suzanne and I have both known loss. We’ve both been rendered helpless by ill-advised choices and worse, choices denied. We’ve experienced the redemptive power of love, the frustration of moving beyond one’s history, the unbidden rage that lives just beneath the surface, and the ever-present awareness of our own mortality.

And we both know how it feels to get off a good shot.

This article originally appeared on The Refresh

Dec 152017
 

 

Christmas ornamentIt’s that time of year when some of us feel compelled to put forth our version of an inspirational message. In times past, I’ve been inspired by both baser and higher impulses. I’ve written about gratitude on more than one occasion, although, truth be told, I find the collective impulse to remind ourselves and everyone else to be grateful to be a little, well, grating. Most of the people I know are well aware of what they have; it doesn’t mean they can or should ignore what they—what we all—might be missing.

On the other hand, words of doom and gloom seem particularly inappropriate this time of year. Not that it’s a happy time for many people I know. I have a number of friends, some virtual, some not, who have faced enormous health and financial challenges this year. I hurt on their behalf. Hell, I hurt on behalf of all the fearful people in the world, myself included.

In my case, the fears are both ordinary and extraordinary, micro and macro. I worry about growing old and becoming infirm, sure. I don’t like the idea of being alone or otherwise disconnected.

Most of all, though, what I fear is an increase (or no visible decrease, at any rate) in illogical, closed-minded intolerance. I call it non-thinking, the visceral reactive state that has far too many people clinging to their beliefs as if they were life preservers. It’s difficult for me to understand how, in 2017 (the twenty-first century!), whole swaths of folks adhere to a values hierarchy that has little to do with morality. They hold fast to outdated or outright false Biblical, biological, and generational maxims at the expense of anything approaching humanity. How else does a cruel, narcissistic adulterer become a touchstone for so many? How else does false equivalency gain credence, while “fake news” is defined as anything remotely critical, regardless of objectivity? How can groups of people be dismissed because of who they are, what they believe, or how they love? How do we live in a world where dictators are heroes and heroes are maligned?

But doom and gloom don’t move us forward any more than do lectures on gratitude or syrupy seasonal wishes. Which is why, after cruising through holiday messages of yore, I’ve gone back to a statement I penned several years ago and lifted from my book Hope in Small Doses. It’s a sort of declaration, not of war or even of independence but of resolve. I have to revisit it from time to time, but now it’s part of my DNA. If it suits or serves you moving into 2018, then by all means, let this be my gift to you.

small christmas tree“I choose hope, at least in small doses. I choose to assign myself a purpose, and embrace the journey that leads to the fulfillment of that purpose. I acknowledge the risk of stumbling along the way, of never completely accomplishing what I set out to do, or of discovering that I inadvertently changed course. I accept as a working theory that humans live their best lives when they ascribe meaning to their lives. I take as a matter of faith that it is within each of us to live meaningful lives, to love, to interact, to connect in fellowship; and that how long our reach, or wide our influence, is far less important than the path we set for ourselves. I realize I will always feel some disappointment and may come to conclusions and discoveries late in life that I wish I’d reached earlier. But so what? That only means I’ve been growing and learning. It also means I’m human…and being fully, completely human is always going to be my most important accomplishment.

I don’t propose to know how hope will continue to fit into my life. I only know that in some small measure, I want it. I need it. I deserve it. We all do.”

Happy holidays whoever and wherever. Here’s to a bright 2018.